11.4.1 Exercise test

The relationship between flow and pressure gradient across a stenosis is exponential; in fact, the resistance to fluid in a tube is a function of the fourth power of its radius (Poiseuille's law) (see Figure 5.139). The increase in resistance to flow is negligible if the surface narrowing is less than 50%, and slight up to 70%; it only becomes significant at 75% and above; a stenosis must therefore be severe to become symptomatic. As the resistance varies with the power of 3 of the surface area and the stenosis progresses at an average rate of 0.1 cm2 per year, the clinical course is precipitated once the stenosis is tight. For example, in the case of aortic stenosis, survival is less than 2 years when dyspnoea occurs.

Fig5 139en

 Figure 5.139: Relationship between flow and pressure gradient across a stenosis. The curves illustrate the relationship for different degrees of stenosis in a 3 mm diameter vessel. On the cartouche the curve shows the variation in resistance created by the stenosis as a function of the degree of stenosis. The curves are exponential. This is because the resistance of a fluid in a tube is a function of the fourth power of its radius (Poiseuille's law): Klocke FJ. Measurement of coronary blood flow and degree of stenosis: Current clinical implications and remaining uncertainties. News Council Clin Cardiol AHA 1982].

 The pressure gradient across a stenosis increases with the square of the velocity (Bernoulli's law), so resistance increases exponentially as blood flow increases. Therefore, a stress test that accelerates flow can objectively demonstrate the onset of symptoms in a patient who claims to have none. In general, symptoms of valvular stenosis occur before ventricular decompensation, whereas heart failure is characterised by functional deterioration of the LV that precedes the onset of clinical symptoms.

Improvements in surgical outcomes over the last twenty years and the ability to perform a valvuloplasty rather than a valve replacement have led to intervention earlier in the course of the disease, when patients are paucisymptomatic and ventricular function is little altered. Under these conditions, a stress test often reveals myocardial damage that is silent at rest. In the case of aortic stenosis, for example, ergometry or dobutamine stress echo can be used to determine the indication for surgery in three different circumstances [6,8].

  • Ischaemic myocardial hibernation;
  • Paucisymptomatic valve disease;
  • Tight stenosis but low pressure gradient (≤ 30 mmHg).

In the first case, the hypokinesia or akinesia is reversible and will benefit from coronary revascularisation. In the second case, the occurrence of dyspnoea, angina or hypotension during exercise indicates the need for valve replacement. In fact, an abnormal test (symptoms, ST changes, gradient increase > 18 mmHg or blood pressure increase < 20 mmHg) is an independent factor for morbidity and mortality at 2 years [3]. In the third case, the problem is to determine which of the two possibilities is present:

  • Tight organic aortic stenosis associated with left ventricular failure secondary to or exacerbated by excessive afterload;
  • Functional aortic stenosis due to the inability of the failing LV to properly open a valve that is simply sclerosed.

An examination at rest, whether by echocardiography, CT or MRI, cannot distinguish between the two situations, which have very different therapeutic sanctions. In fact, aortic valve replacement (AVR) is beneficial in the first case (5-year survival 65%, compared with 11% for medical treatment), but not in the second, where treatment is for ventricular failure [10]. The situation is clarified by examining the relationship between the velocity in the LV outflow tract (VLVOT ) and that across the aortic valve (VVAo ) during a dobutamine stress echo (infusion 5-10 mcg/kg/min) (Figure 11.30) [1,2,5,7].

  • If the stenosis is organic and fixed, the orifice remains unchanged, but Vmax and gradient across the valve increase under the influence of dobutamine (≥ 4 m/s and > 30-40 mmHg, respectively). Under stress, the VLVOT / VVAo ratio continues to widen in a tight stenosis because VTIVAo increases more than VTILVOT; it becomes < 0.2.
  • If the stenosis is functional, the valve orifice becomes larger but the transvalvular gradient does not change. The increase in LV contractility leads to an increase in Vmax in the LVOT (from 0.6 to 1.0 m/s), but not in the aortic valve (3 m/s), because the latter opens wider under the effect of the greater stroke volume without increasing its gradient; the VLVOT / VVAo therefore increases (> 0.3).
  • The test, which can be performed in the operating theatre, also allows the contractile reserve of the LV to be assessed; the prognosis is improved if the stroke volume increases by > 20%.
A pressure rise of <20 mmHg and an ejection volume of <20% during the dobutamine test are associated with a poor prognosis. This inadequate inotropic response stigmatises irreversible ventricular failure, which significantly increases the mortality of surgical intervention [3]. Stress echo is also useful in unmasking symptoms in patients with tight stenosis who are asymptomatic or who hide the reality by limiting their activity. However, it is contraindicated in symptomatic patients with a high gradient [11]. In mitral stenosis, the dobutamine stress test differentiates patients whose transvalvular gradient exceeds 15 mmHg or whose PAP rises above 60 mmHg, even if they are still asymptomatic at rest [8]. These cases are good candidates for mitral valve replacement (MVR). 
 
Fig11 30 en 
Figure 11.30: Ratio of velocities between the LV pressure chamber and the aortic valve (VLVOT/VAo ). The volume passing through the LVOT in each systole is the same as that passing through the aortic valve; the narrowing of the valve imposes an acceleration on the flow; the product of area (S) and velocity (V) remains constant. The flow velocity therefore increases in proportion to the degree of stenosis. In a tight aortic stenosis, the ratio VLVOT/VAo is < 0.25, as shown in the continuous Doppler recording on the right; in this case, VLVOT is 0.8 m/s and VAo is 5.1 m/s; the ratio is 0.16, indicating a very tight stenosis. 
 
In severe asymptomatic mitral insufficiency (MI) or moderate MI with few symptoms at rest, stress echocardiography can identify patients whose PAP exceeds 60 mmHg during exercise, as they will benefit from early mitral valve surgery [4,7]. In ischaemic MI, the pathology is located in the ventricle and the prognosis is much less favourable than in valvular disease proper, both for surgical reconstruction and revascularisation and for medical treatment. Stress echo is useful for defining the therapeutic line in three main circumstances [9].
 
  • Exertional dyspnoea that is disproportionate to the size of the resting MI;
  • Episodes of APO with no apparent cause;
  • Moderate MI prior to surgical revascularisation.
 
Stress test 
 In the context of valvulopathy, dobutamine stress echo is very useful in determining the indication for surgery in 3 circumstances:
- Paucisymptomatic patients
- Narrow stenosis but low transvalvular gradient
- Myocardial hibernation
 
The indication for surgery is confirmed when the stress test shows that
- Systolic PAP increases to > 60 mmHg in mitral stenosis or regurgitation; the gradient increases to gradient increases to > 15 mmHg in mitral stenosis
- The gradient increases across the aortic valve; if the stenosis is functional, the ventricle opens further under dobutamine.Left valve opens further under dobutamine and gradient remains unchanged
- Hypokinesia/akinesia is reversible with dobutamine
 
 
 
 
 
 © CHASSOT PG, BETTEX D, August 2011, last update November 2019

 

References

 

  1. BAUMGARTNER H, FALK V, BAX JJ, et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2017; 38:2739-86
  2. GRAYBURN PA. Assessment of low-gradient aortic stenosis with dobutamine. Circulation 2006; 113:604-6
  3. LANCELLOTTI P, LEBOIS F, SIMON M, et al. Prognostic significance of quantitative exercise Doppler echocardiography in asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Circulation 2005; 112 Suppl I:I1377-82
  4. LANCELLOTTI P, TROISFONTAINES P, TOUSSAINT AC, et al. Prognostic significance of exercise-induced changes in mitral regurgitation in patients with chronic ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 2003; 108:1713-7
  5. LASKEY WK, KUSSMAUL WG, NOORDEGRAAF A. Systemic arterial response to exercise in patients with aortic valve stenosis. Circulation 2009, 119:996-1004
  6. LIN SS, ROGER VL, PASCOE R, et al. Dobutamine stress Doppler haemodynamics in patients with aortic stenosis: feasibility, safety, and surgical implications. Am Heart J 1998; 136:1010-6
  7. NISHIMURA RA, OTTO CM, BONOW RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease. Circulation 2014; 129:e521-e643 
  8. PICANO E, PIBAROT P, LANCELLOTTI P, et al. The emerging role of exercise testing and stress echocardiography in valvular heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54:2251-60
  9. PIERARD LA, LANCELLOTTI P. Stress testing in valvular heart disease. Heart 2007; 93:766-72
  10. TRIBOUILLOY C, LEVY F, RUSINARU D, et al. Outcome after aortic valve replacement for low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis without contractile reserve on dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53:1865-73
  11. VAHANIAN A, ALFIERI O, ANDREOTTI F, et al. Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease (2012 version). Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2012; 33:2451-96